Team Badger refutes the top ten myths
supporting the badger cull in England
These are the claims
made by Government in England, farmers
and others and are refuted.
Claim One: |
You can only get rid of
bTB by addressing the disease in wildlife. |
 |
Claim Two: |
The reduction in bTB
cases in cattle in the Republic of Ireland shows that a
culling policy works. |
 |
Claim Three: |
Case studies from the
USA and New Zealand show that a cull of the wildlife
reservoir is necessary. |
 |
Claim Four: |
The legal protection of
badgers has coincided with the recent rise in bTB. |
 |
Claim Five: |
There continues to be a
rise in bTB in cattle. |
 |
Claim Six: |
It is difficult to
control the movement of animals. |
 |
Claim Seven: |
Badgers that are
infected with the disease suffer so culling badgers will
improve their welfare.
|
 |
Claim Eight: |
Many scientists support
the badger culls. |
 |
Claim Nine: |
It is cheaper to cull
than to vaccinate badgers or introduce better biosecurity.
|
 |
Claim Ten: |
Badger vaccination is
impractical. |
 |
Conclusions:
The top ten claims supporting badger
culling have been
addressed in this report and shown to be wanting.
Press the download button for your own copy of the booklet (pdf format).

'Top Ten Myths Refuted' has been downloaded times.
|