Only a small proportion of badger shootings in the pilot cull will be monitored
to make sure it is humane, it has been revealed.
The Government was accused of not properly assessing the suffering of badgers
after a freedom of information request revealed that as few as 120 shootings
would be independently observed, out of around 5,000 badgers set to be culled.
The Environment Department (DEFRA) also came under fire for failing to fully
disclose information about how it would test whether the cull is humane,
following a separate Freedom of information inquiry, in which it withheld details about examining
The Information Commissioner’s Office ruled DEFRA should not withhold the
information and ordered the Government to disclose methods for assessing the
carcasses, to see if the cull was humane, to the Humane Society International
Following the ruling, HSI-UK accused the Government of trying to avoid making
public information about assessing the suffering of badgers in the pilot culls,
which are intended to test whether culling can take place effectively and
Ministers and farmers insist a cull of the protected animal, which spreads
bovine TB to cattle, is necessary to stop spiralling rates of the disease in
livestock, but opponents say it will have little effect on infection and will
cause suffering to badgers.
Figures provided by DEFRA in response to a query by animal welfare group Care
for the Wild about the percentage of badger kills which would be monitored
revealed that a minimum of 60 shootings for both rifles and shotguns would be
Care for the Wild also claimed only two independent monitors would be on the
ground in the cull zones to check if shooting is being done humanely, and that
DEFRA was planning to follow up with phone calls to marksmen to assess the
Philip Mansbridge, Care for the Wild chief executive, said: “Any pretence that
this cull will be carried out in a humane way has been shot out of the water.”
And he hit out at Prime Minister David Cameron’s suggestion that not going ahead
with the cull would be disastrous for badgers as well as farmers and cattle as a
“blatant” and “inaccurate” attempt to win public support for culling.
“The truth is this cull has no scientific or moral basis. Going ahead with it
will give false hope to farmers, is pointless for cattle and utterly disastrous
As part of the assessment of the cull to see if it is humane, some 240 carcasses
will be collected for post mortem examination, but animal welfare campaigners
HSI-UK said questions on details of the process had not been answered.
DEFRA wrongly refused to say how carcasses would be selected for post mortem
examination, what measures would be used to determine the animals suffered and
how they would factor in wounded badgers which retreated underground to die, the
After their complaint was upheld by the Information Commissioner, Humane Society
International (HSI) UK’s chief
executive Mark Jones, said: “DEFRA has been stalling for many months, clearly
trying to avoid making public this information about how the suffering of shot
badgers will be -assessed.
“We are delighted that the Information Commissioner has instructed DEFRA to
reveal the information, information that should have been released many months
ago so that the proposed methods and criteria could have been examined by
independent experts before a single badger is shot.”
He urged ministers to postpone the cull to allow time for its methods to be
scrutinised by independent experts.